I have two USG's, one with a public IP, one behind NAT. I need to create a site-to-site VPN of some sort between the two. Using the "Site-to-Site VPN" network in the controller does not function. I'm not able to access anything on the side behind NAT right now, aside from via the controller. Has anybody else been in a similar situation?

Oct 17, 2017 Technical Note : How to source NAT IPSec traffic entering To NAT the traffic entering the IPSec tunnel with a specific IP address, a policy-mode IPSec tunnel can be created with the following configuration: Create phase1 using policy-mode IPSec. FGT60C3G10010304 (phase1) # show config vpn ipsec phase1 edit "FortiGate_1_Phase1" set interface "wan1" set proposal 3des-sha1 aes128-sha1 set remote-gw VPN — IPsec — IPsec NAT-T Support | pfSense Documentation VPN Scaling; Using VPNs with IPv6; Remote Access Mobile VPN Client Compatibility; Android VPN Compatibility; L2TP VPN Settings; Using Cisco VPN Pass Through Behind pfSense; PPTP Troubleshooting; What are the limitations of PPTP in pfSense; OpenVPN; IPsec. Configuring a Site-to-Site IPsec VPN; Configuring an IPsec Remote Access Mobile VPN using

Route-Based and Policy-Based VPNs with NAT-T - TechLibrary

VPN Server Behind NAT or Firewall - SoftEther VPN Project Unlike legacy IPsec-based VPN, even if your corporate network doesn't have any static global IP address you can set up your stable SoftEther VPN Server on your corporate network. VPN Azure If the corporate firewall is more restricted and the NAT Traversal of SoftEther VPN doesn't work correctly, instead use VPN Azure to penetrate such a firewall. BOVPN on a Firebox Behind a Device That Does NAT

Unlike legacy IPsec-based VPN, even if your corporate network doesn't have any static global IP address you can set up your stable SoftEther VPN Server on your corporate network. VPN Azure If the corporate firewall is more restricted and the NAT Traversal of SoftEther VPN doesn't work correctly, instead use VPN Azure to penetrate such a firewall.

Solved: AnyConnect VPN behind NAT device - Cisco Community Oct 31, 2017 Site-to-Site VPN behind NAT : UNIFI - reddit I have two USG's, one with a public IP, one behind NAT. I need to create a site-to-site VPN of some sort between the two. Using the "Site-to-Site VPN" network in the controller does not function. I'm not able to access anything on the side behind NAT right now, aside from via the controller. Has anybody else been in a similar situation? How to configure L2TP behind NAT – Zyxel Support Campus EMEA Sometimes it might be necessary to put your USG behind a NAT router, but you still want to build a VPN tunnel to the USG. This tutorial shows how to configure this feature in no-time! Walkthrough Steps. Click on Quick setup > VPN Setup > VPN Settings for L2TP and …